12/28/2023 0 Comments Tunguska meteoroid![]() Of course, no massive historical event would be complete without a healthy dose of aliensdidit, and the involvement of a UFO remains one of the most enduring and popular explanations of the Tunguska explosion to this day. Secondly, a comet composed of enough deuterium to make this believable, even if we consider that the heat of reentry can provide the precise levels of concentrated energy provided to kick-start a fusion reaction, goes against everything we currently know about comet composition. Firstly, the processes of nuclear fusion and fission are incredibly difficult to achieve, requiring precise and controlled conditions, otherwise the chain reactions required simply do not engage-luckily for us. This would be a fine explanation if it wasn't for two things. A year or so later César Sirvent proposed a similar idea and ran with it to the conclusion that a comet rich in deuterium would actually undergo a nuclear explosion, in contrast with D'Alessio and Harms' explanation that at least concluded that the nuclear energy released would be negligible, and could only be used to explain any odd radiation readings. In 1989, again possibly as a joke, Serge D'Alessio and Archie Harms - working from within the bowels of McMaster University - suggested that a deuterium-rich comet could undergo natural nuclear fusion upon contact with the atmosphere. In case either of those two suggestions are causing you to scream "what the fuck‽", then rest assured, your head is screwed on correctly. No problem, of course, as there are two possible suggestions: natural nuclear weapons, and conspiracy. Of course, the main issue with this is that nuclear weapons weren't developed until at least the better part of half a century after the Tunguska event. ![]() The charred remains of trees seen in the photographs of the site do have an eerie resemblance to photos taken 40 years later at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The scale of Tunguska seems to conjure up the idea of nuclear weapons very rapidly in people reading about it. A black hole passing through the Earth would also scoop up a good portion of the planet on its way through, if it didn't swallow it entirely. This would mean finding two Tunguska sized events on different parts of the Earth's surface. An object passing through the Earth would have caused an "exit event", analogous to an exit wound caused by a gunshot. However, there is no evidence that a black hole was involved at all. This hypothesis would explain the high level of destruction - but then again, so would invisible dragons. Such a black hole would be small in size, in that it would have a Schwarzchild radius of 0.15 nanometers. Well, when they say "small" they mean it in terms of volume it would still have been somewhere in the region of 10 17kg, which is about the same weight mass as Saturn's moon Prometheus which is over 43km across. Jackson suggested in 1973 that the Tunguska event was caused by a small black hole passing through the Earth. Possibly as a joke, physicists Michael P. ![]() These more exotic suggestions include black holes, antimatter, UFO crashes, premature nuclear bomb testing, an experiment by Nikola Tesla, and even some kind of terrestrial phenomenon. After all, that the event occurred is practically inarguable so they're halfway there already. And so, paranormal and alternative researchers have been using Tunguska as a test bed for some of the most outlandish ideas they can come up with. So it's a natural part of common sense to suspect something a little different might be going on. The Tunguska event dwarfs the more commonly-sized explosions we're familiar with (gas explosions, oil wells going up, etc.) by an unimaginable margin. Asteroid impacts and meteor airbursts lie outside the realm of common experience, so it's difficult to ascribe an apparently natural cause to this sort of event. Pretty much every major event in history has been hijacked by UFOlogists, conspiracy theorists and general woo merchants - and a big, apparently unexplained, explosion is very attractive for "alternative" explanations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |